Feminists say that us men all want women barefoot pregnant and in the kitchen. Well, they’re wrong. I’m not opposed to footwear. LOL
I’d like to share with you some concepts that can recalibrate your thinking about women. The primary concept is that all actions to “advance” women from out of their God given and natural role of wife and mother, are contrary to God and contrary to what is best for society.
God intends natural unions and divisions among people.
After a failed experiment with communism William Bradford wrote in his Journal of Plymouth Plantation about the communal living: The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years, and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato’s & other ancients, applauded by some of later times;—that the taking away of property, and bringing in community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God. For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed much confusion & discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For the young-men that were most able and fit for labor & service did repine that they should spend their time & strength to work for other men’s wives and children, without any recompense. The strong, or man of parts, had no more in division of victuals & clothes, than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labors, and victuals, clothes, & Etc., with the meaner & younger sort, thought it some indignity & disrespect unto them. And for men’s wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, & Etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it. Upon the point all beginning to have alike, and all to do alike, they thought themselves in the like condition, and one as good as another; and so, if it did not cut off those relations that God hath set amongst men, yet it did at least much diminish and take of the mutual respects that should be preserved amongst them.
Part of what Governor Bradford was saying was that there are natural distinctions that God makes amongst mankind that need to be kept in place to maintain the mutual respect everybody’s position is due.
Distinctions among people form the basis of what respects they are due.
1 Peter 3:6 It was thus that Sarah obeyed Abraham [following his guidance and acknowledging his headship over her by] calling him lord (master, leader, authority). And you are now her true daughters if you do right and let nothing terrify you [not giving way to hysterical fears or letting anxieties unnerve you]. 7 Likewise ye husbands, dwell with them as men of knowledge, giving honor unto the woman, as unto the weaker vessel, even as they which are heirs together of the grace of life, that your prayers be not interrupted.
The apostle Peter also clearly tells us about mutual due respects. He says that women are weaker vessels, right after speaking of their propensity towards hysterical fears and anxieties, yet women have also been given the grace of life and are due to be honored as wives, even though the husband is lord over her. The wife is not to be scorned even though she is known to be weaker and unequal in her created being, because even as God made her a weaker creature, yet God Himself has made it so that she shares in the same saving grace that God gives to husbands, and so she should also receive some honor due as a recipient together of that grace of eternal life. Clearly the Husband is the greater, the lord, and due greater respect, but the point is that neither of them is due contempt, but both are due respect in keeping with God’s order.
What is God’s order?
God created the man(Adam) first, and gave Adam dominion over all the earth. Then God created Eve secondly, and for Adam, to help him and to be a mate to Adam, and so that he might be fruitful and multiply. After they both had sinned, God again made it clear that Adam should rule over Eve, who had tempted him into defiling himself, after she had first defiled herself. The earth was cursed making Adam’s job of providing their “bread” harder. Adam was to be the breadwinner who provided the sustenance for his family.
Women are defilers.
Revelation 14:4 These are the ones who have not defiled themselves with women, for they are virgins. These are the ones who follow the Lamb wherever he goes. These were redeemed from humanity as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb.
So not only was Eve the defiler of the very first man in Genesis, but all the way forward into the future, as recorded in Revelation, women are so defiling of men, that even in heaven, virgin men are honored by God among His holy saints.
Wives owe their husbands reverence.
When a female former fornicator gives her husband less enthusiastic sex than she gave to others, she is defrauding him of the same respect that she showed to other guys. She consciously has chosen to disdain the husband that God so mercifully gave to a whore(who by God’s law deserves death) and she has refused to even cultivate her passion for what is her undeserved gift from God to enjoy. She does this because the love of God is not in her. If Christ were living in her, she would strive to love her husband more and more as she grew to know him better.
Ezekiel 16:32 You unfaithful wife! You desire strangers instead of your husband.
The prophet Ezekiel makes it clear that it is unfaithfulness for a wife to desire strangers instead of her own husband. If Christ were living in her she would cultivate her desire and her passion for her beloved. If she was having difficulty showing her husband the same respect she paid to others, she would be fasting and praying that God’s Holy Spirit would ignite a fire of passion inside her for her own husband. Do you blaspheme the Holy Spirit by believing the lie that God’s Holy Spirit is an evil cuckolding spirit living inside of women that causes them to defraud their husbands of the respect that they showed other sexually immoral men? Do you honestly believe that a woman filled with God’s Holy Spirit will go on sinning her entire life in such great unfaithfulness and not ever be convicted to see to it that she reverence her own husband as commanded in Ephesians 5:33?
Matthew 25:40 And the King will answer them, “Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.” 41 Then he will say to those on his left, “Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.”
Wives serving other men too much is unfaithfulness to their own husbands.
For a woman to desire to serve other men more than her own husband, whether through her work or through her sexuality, is unfaithfulness to her vow to be his, forsaking all others. Women shouldn’t get married if they want to serve some other men rather than their husband, they should stay single if they don’t intend to serve their husband as a keeper of his house, and by their unfaithfulness blaspheme the word of God. As below the apostle Paul commanded the older women:
Titus 2:4 That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, 5 To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.
The marital bed is holy and a pleasure that should be enjoyed at all times.
Younger women, like the one shown in the meme above, really should be married and at home serving a husband. Her young breasts and baby maker, really are her most highly desired job qualifications that no man has, and they are made for a divine purpose that no job can surpass, that brings God glory, for which she was lovingly and wonderfully created, to submit herself to an image of God, and become one flesh with him and bear the offspring of a god.(John 10:34)
Proverbs 5:18 Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth. 19 Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love. 20 And why wilt thou, my son, be ravished with a strange woman, and embrace the bosom of a stranger?
1 Timothy 2:15 But she shall be saved through her child-bearing, if they continue in faith and love and sanctification with sobriety.
Women work out their salvation by fulfilling their God-ordained role.
Getting a young woman trained in the ways of the Lord and married to a godly man and ready for keeping home should be her parents highest priority for her, because that is God’s highest priority for her and His purpose for making women. Young women should be taught to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed. That is real “Affirmative Action” for young women’s absolutely divine calling. What this evil world calls “Affirmative Action” for women is actually just defiance against God’s highest calling for women. I’ll let y’all ponder all the manifold ways the world tries to get young women into their camp. As their deceitfully “affirming” Feminist signs welcome young women into the workforce, telling them “Arbeit macht frei”, which means: “Work makes [you] free”.
I’m sorry the above post isn’t a direct addressing of the topic, but wound up being more of a stream-of-consciousness presenting of thoughts that led me to realize that all workplace “Affirmative Action” for women is actually aimed against God’s order for marriage and the family, and is destructive to society, and is consequently evil. I may brush it up some, later, or rehash it in a future post.
Now some Feminists may ask, but what about female nurses and teachers?
The short answer is that those jobs were once done quite well by men or spinsters. It isn’t God’s ideal for a wife to abandon her focus on her husband and his home, to chase after other things. I’m not saying that a husband can’t ever send his wife off to work, I’m just saying that is far from ideal, and it should be almost a last resort for him.
Another great comment that informed my thinking, and that I will probably be “stealing” from soon to make an upcoming post, was this insightful one by “thedeti”:
https://sigmaframe.wordpress.com/2020/12/11/3-things-that-make-women-tick/#comment-4893
…all workplace “Affirmative Action” for women is actually aimed against God’s order for marriage and the family, and is destructive to society, and is consequently evil.
Yes, and as we can now clearly see, this has been deliberately imposed by the temporal Powers That Be. Worse still is that fake Christians (a.k.a. “churchians”) not only have embraced this new sociosexual order with an ardor not even reserved for Jesus, but have even doubled down on the World’s script by essentially persecuting, or even disfellowshiping any young Christian man who makes it known that he seeks a young, virginal keeper of the home in a wife.
I begin to wonder if a “counter-shaming” campaign against worldly churchians is worth the effort. Expose their worldly, Scripture-hating philosophy and make them answer the question of why they are telling God that His ways don’t work. Cowards that they are, most would run from the confrontation.
@ Sharkly,
This is one of your best posts yet!
I am still so steeped in feminism that when I got to the part about a wife praying and fasting to desire her husband more, I laughed.
I’m sure that happens sometimes, but you are saying it should be the cultural mainstream in church. I agree and it’s based on God’s Word and I laughed because it just seems so unlikely to ever happen.
You provide a biblical solution to Betty Friedan’s problem with no name, and yet it seems more likely that pigs fly before Christian women give up the comforts the acceptance of their rebellion has gained.
Your post should be read by every single Christian hoping to be married. It’s great to be a better vettor via Sigma’s and Deep Strength’s sites, but this provides a necessary companion to vetting tips.
@ Swanny,
I agree. Vetting serves limited benefits if you don’t understand the “goals” of establishing Headship and glorifying God. This is a Truth that has been buried under all the lies of Feminism.
“(11) Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. (12) But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. (13) For Adam was first formed, then Eve. (14) And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. (15) Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.” – 1 Tm 2:15, KJV
From Strong’s: ‘sozo’ for which the definition is given:
to save, deliver, protect, do well, make whole
For which the context is:
III. Specifically of salvation from eternal death, sin, and the punishment and misery consequent to sin. (1 Tm 2:15)
Emphasis mine. Salvation is by faith and grace, not by works. The promise in 1 Tm 2:15 is an ‘out’ from the torment of her curse: the desire to rule over her husband, and the pain both in childbearing and in him ruling over her.
Bearing children is both her purpose in Creation, and the manner in which she eschews the pain of having failed Adam in the Garden. Instead of feeling the weight of his rule, she is fulfilled (and joyful) when with child… provided she continues in faith, charity, holiness, sobriety (= to keep submitting).
So, men, if you got ’em, put kids in ’em. If she starts getting uppity, she’s really asking for another kid. Do the duty, hit that booty, squeeze those hooties, give her a scooty and voila: no more moody.
I am still so steeped in feminism that when I got to the part about a wife praying and fasting to desire her husband more, I laughed.
Swanny River,
We all are steeped in this satanic brew of Feminist lies. It is only the Bible and other older writings that allow a person to see that there are simple solutions to all of our current problems. However the solutions are almost unthinkable, because we’d have to give up our idolatrous worship of women, and restore God’s holy patriarchy. Once again we would rightly treat all women as the God-given property of men,(fathers & husbands) and take all of men’s rights back away from women, and make all people control themselves in accordance with God’s seven laws given to Noah, for all of mankind. We would need to again see men alone as images of God and His glory.(1 Corinthians 11:7) And wives should live in subjection to their husbands which is entirely fitting in the Lord.(Colossians 3:18) Meanwhile men would need to be stalwart enough to know better than to hearken to women instead of God Most High.
The primary directive of such a patriarchal society would have to be that neither women nor any other idol could supplant the preeminence of God so that our masculine Father & Son Godhead would be served by every aspect of all of our beings. And a second directive like it would be that we men would treat our brethren who are likewise in the image of our God, with the same dignity that we ourselves know by conscience that we as men should all be treated. From those two underlying principles we’d derive the basis for all laws.
Recently I have heard men in the manosphere opine that women can’t manufacture genuine sexual desire for roughly 80% of men. LOL While that is a general observation of the broken state of our society, it is untrue as to the capability of women the way God intends them to be. The truth is that in women’s deceived state they are not inclined to do what is necessary to desire sex with men whom they have been taught by demonic lies are the images of pigs or monkeys from which they supposedly evolved. Women all naturally want sex with a man they can look up to, but not a near equal, or a man below them. The primary problem is only their deceived perspective. If women were raised in a society that taught them and acted like, all men were far superior to all women, that men were little gods, the images and glories, little chips off of the Most High God, then the hypergamy of most women would be satisfied just by getting a husband chosen by her father, as was once the case during the patristic age of the Church when that truth was taught. A woman’s sexual desire is a product of her respect for a man. The truth is that women are currently taught by society to disrespect most men. However if she realizes this truth, she can set about to renewing her mind, and it is entirely possible for her to learn to prefer her husband, just like how she prefers her own children to other children even though they may not be in the top 20% of children. Women can easily control their sex drives, they just need to be taught how. But right now society and all churches teach Feminist discontentment based on lies. The truth can set women and men free, but right now even the manosphere is mostly dodging God’s truth, and still clinging to the foundational hunks of the heresy of Feminism.
Jack,
Just to sharpen me, what things did you like about this post, and what things don’t you like about some of my other posts?
ikr,
James 2:14-26
Salvation might not be by the works, but if the works aren’t there, the saving faith probably isn’t either. I trust we’re on the same page regarding that.
feeriker,
I think counter-shaming campaigns against worldly churchians are well needed, and I thank you for your tireless and loyal support of my premier one. I think if I could get more commenters over there it would help, but the Lord sees your efforts to support your brother, and I owe you one my brother, I’m definitely thankful for all those who comment there. And I’d be happy to support others in efforts of their own.
Sharkly, This post is good for several reasons.
1. The image and caption is both funny and fitting to the subject of the post.
2. The theme “Affirmative Action for Baby Makers” is a humorous but true switcheroo.
3. It outlines the basic set of traits that have gone missing from femininity and marriage over the last several decades.
4. It spells out why these missing traits need to be in place in order to glorify God.
5. It has many scripture references to back up your points.
6. It offers practical applications.
I’ve been reading your blog since it’s inception, and I can see that most all your posts have a central theme — that a woman’s overriding purpose in life is to glorify her husband, and that this is an archetype of how Christians glorify God. So, you have a very important message within the Manosphere, because this is a Truth that has been thoroughly denigrated and buried under all the lies of Feminism.
The one thing that offsets many of your past posts is the underlying tone of bitterness and scorn. I can understand this, given the tribulations you’ve endured from your wife and church, but it detracts from your overall message. As long as there is a tone of bitterness, no one outside of the Manosphere will hear your message and take it to heart.
Feeriker has the right idea. Your blog is called “Laughing at Feminism”, so it is entirely appropriate for you to be comparing the worldly/churchian systems to God’s ordained order, and making the former out to be ridiculous by comparison. IOW, instead of categorically scorning wayward wimmin, you should be scorning the habits, beliefs, and teachings that cause Churchian wimmin to go that way.
All the best~! I hope to see you post more frequently in the future.
OT application question: Did I just screw a Dad?
I caught an 11-year old and two friends flipping and using a concrete bench as a skateboard ramp in my condo common area. I took another board member with me to talk to the kid. He refused to leave saying insolently, that he wasn’t done yet. I told him to put the bench back as a resolution. He didn’t and tried running. He lives nearby and I know his name, so I laughed and called he and his younger brother out by name and said it’s easier to put the bench back than it is to run. He came out of hiding and said he wasn’t done yet. I said he is, it’s private property. He said, “private property my ass.” He walked away, got his two buds and went back to the ramp. So, fearful of lawyers, I didn’t lay a hand on him, but called the police and informed the board.
There are more important details, such as the board wanted the police involved, not just me, but I am too long on this. We had a condo resident who knows them talk to them, to ask the boy to apologize instead of having an order written up, but the
Mom rebuffed him.
The Dad, (I was told it was a single Mom house) came over yesterday but I wasn’t home. If he is the actual birth Dad, then he is probably coming to tear into me. Do I apologize for calling the police instead of going to the Dad (who I didn’t think existed)?
The boy had a neighborhood search with swarming cops, for him just a few weeks ago because he left on Saturday morning and didn’t return until Sunday and everyone thought he was abducted. He never said what happened but a friends Dad thinks he was hanging with older kids, got drunk, passed out and didn’t know what to do the next morning. The kid was never punished for that, so I was attributing it to a stupid single Mother, but I don’t know. He wasn’t grounded.
James 2:14-26
Salvation might not be by the works, but if the works aren’t there, the saving faith probably isn’t either. I trust we’re on the same page regarding that.
Emphasis mine. “Probably”. Works are proof-positive of the Spirit at work in you. Works do not earn us salvation.
Ep 2:8-9: (8) For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: (9) Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Emphasis mine. The Spirit makes this clear, and why it is this way. It is a major stumbling block of the Catholic or Mormon. In fact, it is the single biggest delineator between Christianity and all other worldly religions, which includes many who worship Egalitarianism which is Humanism which is Satanism despite calling themselves Christian.
We are charged to perform works, as proof, as a personal reminder of our Saving Grace:
Jn 5:14: Afterward Jesus found him in the temple, and said to him, “See, you have been made well. Sin no more, lest a worse thing come upon you.”
With every act of Forgiveness, Christ first tests the man, and concludes with a task. This task or burden, which we are charged to take up (Mt 11:29), which we are affirmed is ‘light’ and easy to bear (Mt 11:30), serves as a guiding reminder of our reborn state.
For women, who were created for servitude, but who were cursed with the desire to reign over, this curse is made light with the bearing of children (provided they continue in submission). Their Salvation is not earned, or guaranteed, or influenced by having children- or not- or the quality of children they raise.
—
When we all meet the Father, it begins with Damnation. The Wrath is pouring out for us having sinned. The Son stands in the way. The Father cannot be in the presence of imperfection, and us having sinned, cannot be in the presence of the Father. The Son’s blood covers us. For those of us who have proclaimed the Son before Man- in words, in deeds, in fruit, the Son will defend us before the Father.
The Father will ask the Son ‘what has this man done to execute My Commandments’ and the Son will list the ways we, as men, executed our purpose in creation to work (Ge 2:15), to master, to dominate this World (Ge 1:28) and spread this knowledge, work ethic, promise of Salvation to others. The Father will accept the Son’s pleading, as the Son’s acknowledgement is perfect. The Son will turn to us and say: Well done, my good and faithful servant.
For women, the question the Father will ask the Son is: ‘what has this woman done to bring glory to man’ (as this is her reason for being created). Marriage, keeping a home, and children will help the Son answer to the Father.
Sharkly, when you stated: Women work out their salvation by fulfilling their God-ordained role.
The usage of the word ‘work’ with ‘salvation’ caused a micro-aggression (small alarm) and triggered (sought to confirm what is written) me. I had to run to my safe space (the Bible), have a good cry (secure references) and then have my peaceful protest (mature dialogue) and dox you (talk it out mano-a-mano).
I believe we are aligned. Works-based Salvation is a sticking point, is all.
Swanny River
DECEMBER 15, 2020 AT 6:05 AM
Sounds like one messed up kid. If this kid has a father, it doesn’t sound like he’s very much involved in his son’s life. Maybe a bio dad ejected from the home by Mom who is only allowed occasional visits, and thus has limited influence in the boy’s life?
Sadly, we live in an age where you almost have to consider all kids to be feral unless you know them to be otherwise. Another poisonous fruit of feminist matriarchy.
Thank you, Jack, that is a very constructive critique, and gives me much to work on.
And yes it is tough to put a happy face on the torment I suffer. In all likelihood I will not get to see or hear from my own sons during the entire upcoming Christmas break, due to the spiteful hardhearted evil of my wife, churchians, and the “family” court system. My wife is supposed to be sharing the kids with me “by agreement” but she just never does, and claims her demonic cunt lawyer has told her that she never has to hand my sons over for my parenting time. Meanwhile the cunt-court is harassing me about “discovery” paperwork I’m supposed to do to aid the cunt-court in stealing my money and finishing my divorce thereby skipping past any effort that is to be made to reconcile my marriage in the best interest of the children. I have allowed the divorce to drag out for three years, without any guaranteed access to my sons, and incurring huge financial burden and uncertainty, just so that I could finally ask to have my wife compelled to go to joint marriage counselling with somebody trained to deal with her intimacy-anorexia in the best interest of the children. I still have not been given any opportunity to raise my own concerns about my wife’s highly questionable fitness to be parenting the boys considering all her prior diagnoses and further intimacy disorder on the sex addiction spectrum. Meanwhile I am pilfered and assailed with paperwork by the court, all while my wife consistently refuses to perform the things she has agreed to before the cunt-court. The court has given full force of the law to my wife’s every false accusation, even as I have had to painstakingly disprove each and every one, at great cost to myself and with undue delay by the court in addressing my proof of innocence. Meanwhile the wicked cunt-court judge has used every trick in the book to deny me the chance to speak in court in my own defense and even ask for what is in the best interest of the children. One time I’m refused to make my requests because I don’t have legal counsel, then the next time I’m not allowed to even speak because I did bring legal counsel. Meanwhile demon-cunt is allowed to run her mouth constantly interjecting when it is her turn to shut her lie hole and let my lawyer speak. May the Lord rebuke those whores. After having my kids stolen based upon false accusations for well over a year, cunt-judge told me when I finally got to see her in court about another matter that I was not allowed to even briefly discuss my divorce with her because my wife’s counsel was not present. However the next time I saw her, I caught cunt-judge secretly talking with a lawyer that was suing me, about his case against me. That hypocritical Satan serving whore will break the rules of jurisprudence whenever she pleases, but yet still claims to be bound by them in such a way as to render her unable to ever lift a finger to relieve the kidnapping and intentional alienation of my sons which she enabled by constantly backing my certified-deranged wife with all the powers of her cunt-court. That wretched whore who usurps as a judge over men to enable the kidnapping of their children, to allow the alienation of children from their fathers, and to separate marriages in the service of Satan, that God Himself had joined together, has one remaining chance to give me equal consideration, she has granted force of law to every false accusation and motion against me, a good and Godfearing man in my fifties who has never ever been charged with more than a speeding ticket prior to having my sons stolen. I have been advised that she’ll most likely decide wickedly again, but after much earnest prayer and fasting I am settled about my future dealings with some tyrannical fools who worship their own vaginas. Through the providence of God the fools have stripped away the only incentives that mattered to me, the souls of those I love, and their further fines, threat of imprisonment, or other threats against my life will no longer sway me. It can be a sign for you
Sharkly, inre your current divorce situation:
As America collapses into Civil War II (and this is now inevitable), the perverse legal cancer that is the current system is sure to collapse along with it. What is unsustainable will not be sustained, and the misandric monster that is “cunt court” is one of those things (there is no longer any viable economic foundation upon which to financially ass-rape men, so that alone will spell the end of the system).
As for the demonic vermin that are “family law attorneys” (specifically, divorce attorneys), most of them might just wind up on the business ends of pointed lead projectiles once CW II goes “hot.”
A minor quibble: There is only one mention in the Bible of Sarah referring to Abraham as “Lord”. Out of millions of women, only one mention of one woman referring to her husband as “Lord”. Methinks that is much ado about nothing.
Abraham was an extremely wealthy man. A study of his life and his surroundings suggest that, with his wealth, he had some title that was significant to his contemporaries. Given that the word “lord” is an english word, it is not likely that Sarah actually uttered that word. Rather, she likely uttered whatever the word was in their language that denoted his position in society.
God did not tell Eve to call her husband lord. God did not tell Eve to submit to Adam. In fact, God did not tell Eve anything – other than that her husband would rule over her. Not “rule her”, but “rule over her”. But God did give us a clue in general about Eve when he said that it was not good for man to be alone – and so he made a “help” for Adam (knowing full well that she would force Adam to choose between her and God).
In order to truely be a help to someone, you must pay attention to their directives. One cannot pay attention to someone’s directives while they are pursuing their own agenda. So, we can confidently state that, to be a help, one must submit their will to the will of the helped (pursue their agenda rather than one’s own agenda), and one must pay attention to the directives of the helped (which immediately implies a heirarchy).
One can “submit” without ever being a true help.
One cannot ever truely be a help without submitting to the will of the helped, to the instructions of the helped.
A paraphrase of the creation story is this: she was created to be a help to him, and she was informed that he would rule over her. Her “submission” flows from her role as a “help”.
How can she be the help God created her to be if he does not have an agenda that he needs her help with? How can she focus on his agenda rather than on her own if he does not have one? How can he “rule over her” if he does not establish his own “kingdom”, of which she is a part?
Finally, how can he “rule over her” when the state makes it illegal to do so?
And consider: In spite of God and Adam being the original bromance, God saw that Adam was alone. God said it was not good that he should be alone (God admitting that he did not intend for him alone [God] to be sufficient for Adam), and so he made a “help” for Adam, creating her purposely with the ability and desire to dominate Adam and make him choose between her and God. Well – if God himself admitted he was not enough for Adam, and so created a “help” for him, we can infer from this that God intended Adam to choose Eve over him. This interpretation is further supported by a verse elsewhere in the Bible (1 Peter 1:19-20) where God says that Jesus was intended to be the solution to Adam choosing Eve over God (the eating of the forbidden fruit), a solution created from before the foundation of the earth, from before the creation of Adam and Eve.
That is the true story of creation. The implications of which are hardly, if ever, given serious consideration in what I have seen of the Christian manosphere. The problems inherent in the truth of the previous paragraph do not begin to be addressed by a man finding a woman who will be submissive in a passive / agressive sort of way. The submission of interest to God flows out of the reason he created Eve – to be a “help”. She cannot be one if the man does not give her instructions (rule over her) as to what he needs from her that will help him. And society has pretty much made it illegal for any man to operate in that manner. Which allows what God said to Eve, “your desire (in both meanings of the word) will be to him”, to gain ascendancy. To the ruin of society, because man has had the ability to rule over it taken away from him by the state.
There is not an easy solution (maybe no solution) to that conundrum.
re. Sarah referring to Abraham as “lord”.
My point was, by using the title afforded to Abraham by society, she was honoring his position by calling him by his title. That in and of itself is significant.
Compare to the multitude of women who do not honor the position that their husband has attained in society – insisting that they are actually nothing more than husband and father, and not a good one at that.
RichardP
Welcome, and thanks for sharing some new perspective.
With regard to your statement:
“There is only one mention in the Bible of Sarah referring to Abraham as “Lord”. Out of millions of women, only one mention of one woman referring to her husband as “Lord”. Methinks that is much ado about nothing.”
Firstly, Sarah calling Abraham “Lord” is mentioned twice in the canonical Bible both in Hebrew and in Greek, with additional mentions in non-canonical scriptures. With regard to the predicted birth of Isaac:
Genesis 18:12(ESV) So Sarah laughed to herself, saying, “After I am worn out, and my lord is old, shall I have pleasure?”
And then the apostle Peter singles Sarah out from all the “millions of women” as an exemplar of holiness exactly because she is recorded as acknowledging Abraham as her Lord.(Kurios):
1 Peter 3:5-6(NIV) For this is the way the holy women of the past who put their hope in God used to adorn themselves. They submitted themselves to their own husbands, like Sarah, who obeyed Abraham and called him her LORD. You are her daughters if you do what is right and do not give way to fear.
According to my rough speculation 85% of the Bible is stuff that doesn’t get repeated. So the fact that something from the Old Testament is specifically repeated in the New Testament signifies that it is both important and applicable to us new-covenant believers, as the Apostle Peter was inspired to show us.
With regard to your statement:
God did not tell Eve to call her husband lord. God did not tell Eve to submit to Adam. In fact, God did not tell Eve anything – other than that her husband would rule over her. Not “rule her”, but “rule over her”.
It isn’t really recorded for us, except for a few statements, what all God said to Eve. We do know that Eve was made for and given to Adam by God. Which implies Eve was Adam’s to have and subject under the dominion God gave to Adam(in the Hebrew) over all the earth and all creatures of earth.
I do however agree with you that is seems like God knowingly gave Adam a defiler to test Adam’s worth-ship and that God clearly foreknew about “Adam choosing Eve over God” and thereby giving his wife the worth-ship that belonged solely to God. And it seems in Adam’s reply to God, that Adam is hinting that God set him up:
Genesis 3:12 The man said, “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit of the tree, and I ate.”
“The submission of interest to God flows out of the reason he created Eve – to be a “help”. She cannot be one if the man does not give her instructions (rule over her) as to what he needs from her that will help him. And society has pretty much made it illegal for any man to operate in that manner.
Yes! I’ve got a demon-cunt lawyer and a cunt-court judge both throwing me under the bus for wanting to take ownership of my wife and kids, and have some say over their lives. I wish everybody could see that. How I, as the image of the Bridegroom(husband), and the image of the Father, have been reduced to only a servant, and never a ruler in my own family, by the usurping forces of satanic evil that oppose me in cunt-court, which is fully supported by the churchians who whore after this world’s satanic Feminism.
Hey, the woman in the picture appears to know where her highest value lies. Not a bad thing.
Now she just needs to be trained to wear women’s clothing, to not cut her hair, to cover her head, and to be submissive and sexually loyal to her husband.
If women are to have “glorious” long hair. Just what length or lengths are glorious? Some Sikhs aren’t ever supposed to cut their hair according to the practice of Kesh. Some faiths believe men should have full beards for a similar reason, because God made the hair to be there, and Etc.